Jun 292011
The following piece was published today in Batavia Business, the monthly newsletter of the Batavia Chamber of Commerce.
“You were a little snappish” a friend told me, with a smile and glint in her eye, after a recent Chamber Board meeting. She was right…but I was hoping it wasn’t that obvious. While I may owe her an explanation, I actually owe it to myself.
A recent European trip to visit our daughter was intended to be no more than a tourist’s sojourn. As it turns out, the journey had unexpected consequences. Allow me to illuminate a few pieces of a puzzle that is emerging in my life—and then try to assemble them into some kind of coherent, yet still incomplete story.
One piece contains portraits of anonymous stone masons from the 13th century who spent their entire lives shaping and laying stones that became a cathedral in Nantes, France; an edifice that would not be completed for more than 20 generations. I stood in awe of their craftsmanship, and their dedication to a vision they had no hope of seeing to completion. Their contribution was essential…yet their identity forever lost.
While in Europe, and on my return, a second puzzle piece emerged from two intellectual excursions. In Europe I began a trek through a thousand-page volume called Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years by Diarmaid MacCulloch. Since our return, I have been enjoying an 18-hour series of lectures entitled Great Minds of the Eastern Intellectual Tradition by Professor Grant Hardy of the University of North Carolina.
The puzzle piece that forms as I study humanity’s wisdom traditions is that, like the stone masons of Nantes, untold millions of deeply philosophical humans contributed to the ideas that define and gird human wisdom and understanding, but for the vast majority, their contribution too, is essential, and their identity forever lost.
The third puzzle piece is defined by my experience of being immersed in cultures decidedly different from the one I left behind. As you walk the streets of European cities, it is common to hear a dozen languages—and see as many modes of dress—within a few short blocks. I became aware of just how much I don’t know about the world.
I arrived in Europe with some sense of being wise and worldly…and arrive in this moment having been reminded of my ignorance and naïveté.
The puzzle pieces strewn in front of me have something to do with the existential angst of being human. Most of us hope we will leave something behind that future generations will experience with admiration. I strive to make something of my time on this planet; from talking with people struggling not to end their lives, to teens struggling to understand theirs. Even the struggle to put these few words on paper is part of my search for meaning.
And yet, having come face-to-face with authors of our wisdom traditions and creators of monuments to human imagination, it is difficult not to view your own contribution with a skeptical eye. “Is this the best I could have done?”
 The roots of this story are nourished by a growing awareness of my own mortality and imminent loss of my identity to future generations. Until I come to terms with that angst, I will likely remain “a little snappish.”
Jun 252011
Note: This piece is being published in an the July-August issue of Neighbors of Batavia magazine. Reprinted with permission.
They laid the first stone April 14, 1434—three hundred and forty two years before American’s Declaration of Independence. It took 50 years just to complete the façade. Inauguration of the nave and aisles occurred in the late 1500s. On December 25, 1891, 457 years after they began, Bishop Jules François Lecoq inaugurated the completed St. Peter and St. Paul’s cathedral in Nantes, France.
On a recent visit with our daughter after her semester abroad, I stood in the nave of this edifice, gazing upward 114 feet to the roof. The interior is 116 feet wide and 313 feet long. The outside towers raise 192 feet. These somewhat cold statistics cannot begin to instill the awe that overwhelms you as you stand in this magnificent holy space.
As I stood in this vessel—a message sent from the Middle Ages, and delivered to me in this moment—I realize the stones in the columns I stand beside were carefully, perhaps lovingly, put in place by a mason more than 500 years ago. My mind is flooded with questions I fear we have lost the ability to answer. When we find it difficult to create plans that survive four decades, how was it possible 600 years ago to design a structure that would not be completed for more that four centuries—and last a thousand years? In an environment in which every generation is encouraged to leave their unique fingerprint on the future, how did more than 20 generations refrain from changing the cathedral’s original design? When the technologies we use to transmit information to the future change every 2 or 3 years, can we even conceive of passing plans entrusted to fragile parchment across more than 400?
However, the questions that most intrigue me relate to the mason who laid the stones in front of me—perhaps a hundred years after construction began. Even if he began as an apprentice and spent the entirety of his life dedicated to the completion of this monument to his creator, it would have risen only a few meters as he lay on his deathbed. He woke every morning, and invested all of himself for his entire life, inspired only by a vision of this gift to generations so distant their lives were simply unimaginable? Would any of us be willing to toil for our entire lives on a project begun by our great, great, great, great, great grandparents, which will not be completed before the birth of our great, great, great, great, great grandchildren?
In an ironic coincidence, I began reading Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years by Diarmaid MacCulloch before we began our two week pilgrimage. As MacCulloch relates the history and derivation of the Christian faith, he touches on the origin, meaning and symbolism of the world’s great cathedrals. As I read MacCulloch’s words and chapters, and stroll the masons’ nave and aisles, I am struck by the juxtaposition of the creation of a cathedral and the formation of humankind’s great wisdom traditions. Each is a gift from the past, built from seemingly infinite, small, often courageous contributions by mostly anonymous individuals.
I am left to imagine generations 600 years hence. What will they come to know of us? What messages will we have left behind that speak of our visions and passions? Are we building any edifice—with the bricks we lay or the wisdom we formulate—that will invite them into a feeling of awe? Then the final questions emerge: What have I done, what will I do today, and to what will I dedicate my remaining days to help craft a message of wisdom, grace and beauty to be left for my great, great, great, great, great grandchildren? The masons of the 15th century had answers we may have forgotten.
Jun 022011
A recent Chamber presentation by Mike McKinley entitled “Laughing Your Way to Success & Happiness,” invited more thought about our third unalienable right: the pursuit of happiness. Since we have been in pursuit for 235 years; certainly we’ve made progress.
In many industries, the U.S. leads the world in production efficiency and effectiveness. So why not in the creation of happiness and well-being? As one of the wealthiest nations ever to grace the planet we have the resources to tickle our funny bone when faced with virtually any dilemma. Our technological progress—astounding by any measure—has surely brought us unprecedented bliss. Our pharmaceutical industry has developed an arsenal of weapons to combat every mental illness or depression. Our progress in the efficient creation of happiness must likewise be astounding.
Oh contraire! Meet the HPI—Happy Planet Index—developed by the New Economics Foundation. The HPI measures how efficiently a country converts resources into well-being for its citizens. In other words, it measures the units of “happiness” created for each square foot of carbon footprint employed. Similar to business; the spoils go, not to the one who produces the most, but to he who produces most efficiently.
As we explore, keep in mind the HPI does not measure the happiest countries, but the relative efficiency with which nations convert natural resources into long and happy lives. The results? The United States scores a 30.7. Most African nations score lower; Zimbabwe is at 16.6. On the other hand, we score lower—often much lower—than most every other nation in the world. Russia scores 34.5; Canada 39.4, Poland 42.8, Mexico 55.6, China 57.1, and Brazil an astounding 61.
There are three components to the HPI. Happiness results from both life expectancy and a measure of life satisfaction. On those, the U.S. actually scores somewhat better than other countries. Our downfall is the amount we spend to get that level satisfaction for the years we live. The ecological footprint we employ for our slightly higher “happiness” does us in; our costs are out of proportion to what we produce. If there was a world market for satisfaction, we would have an abundance to sell, but our costs are so uncompetitive that no one could afford to buy what we produce!
While we are one of the wealthiest nations ever to grace the planet, we tickle our funny bone with a mountain of trinkets that ultimately do not make us happy. While our technological progress is astounding, we use our laptops, tablets, droids and iPhones to remain connected…at a comfortable distance from one another. Our growing arsenal of expensive pharmaceuticals is stockpiled, not just to fight severe mental illness, but to numb us from even the slightest hint of sadness.
There are graphs for any process that compare the next bit of benefit from an added expense. These define the cost/benefit debates we engage in every day. For some reason, it appears we don’t even engage in that debate when it comes to happiness. We appear willing to throw the Earth’s limited resources willy-nilly in virtually any direction in its pursuit. Should we continue, happiness, and its pursuit, just might be less unalienable than we thought.